STRIDE workshops
Facilitated sessions with PM, design, and engineering present.
Qbatch · Threat Modeling
Design reviews that surface risks early in the SDLC.
Structured threat modeling workshops for new features and architectures — STRIDE, attack trees, and mitigations captured before code is written.
Modeling workshop
STEP 1
Frame
System boundaries & assets
STEP 2
Diagram
Data flows & trust zones
STEP 3
Threaten
STRIDE & abuse cases
STEP 4
Mitigate
Controls & design changes
STEP 5
Track
Backlog & review gates
Capabilities
Cheaper to fix in Figma and architecture — not in prod.
Shift-left security that product and engineering teams actually attend.
Architecture review
New microservices, integrations, and data stores before build.
Documented outputs
Threat diagrams, ranked risks, and mitigation owners.
Team enablement
Teach your leads to run lighter models on every epic.
Abuse case library
Reusable patterns for auth, payments, and admin surfaces.
SDLC integration
Gates in design review — not a security-only side channel.
Builder-friendly
Mitigations are design and code tasks — not security theater.
Feature-scoped
Model one epic in a half-day; architecture reviews for platform changes.
Living artifacts
Diagrams update as the system evolves.
Explore more
Cyber Security services
Security Audits
Baseline assessments across apps, cloud, and processes.
Penetration Testing
Simulated attacks to find gaps before attackers do.
Compliance (SOC 2, HIPAA)
Controls and evidence for audits and certifications.
Identity & Access
SSO, RBAC, and secrets management done right.
Incident Response
Playbooks and support when something goes wrong.
Threat Modeling FAQ
When should we threat model?+
New features with auth, payments, PII, or external integrations — and any major architecture change.
Do developers need security expertise?+
No. We facilitate; the team brings domain knowledge. Output is actionable for any senior engineer.
Remote workshops?+
Yes — collaborative boards and structured agendas work well distributed.